Since its inception in 2020, America’s Favorite Pet has captured audiences and pet owners across the country while offering the opportunity for cats and dogs to compete for the title of America’s Favorite Pet. The competition offers cash prizes of $10,000 and magazine covers, and it has raised millions for animal charities. However, beneath the surface of this seemingly wholesome competition lies a storm of controversy. Though some laud its charitable contributions, others accuse it of exploiting participants and fostering discontent among pet owners. As the 2025 edition nears its end, the debate surrounding America’s Favorite Pet is reaching boiling point, with accusations of manipulation, opaque rules, and emotional exploitation dominating online discussion groups.
The Contest’s Premise
America’s Favorite Pet is an annual online popularity contest in which pets compete for votes across multiple rounds. The winners, a dog, and a cat, also receive cash and magazine features. The contest’s proceeds are donated to charities like PAWS, which rehabilitates neglected animals. Though the company offers the contest with the best of intentions, critics say its design puts profits ahead of transparency and fairness.
Shay: A Symbol of Hope Amid Controversy
One unique competitor this year is Shay, a double-amputee therapy cat whose owner operates a veteran mental health center in Florida. Shay’s story has resonated with voters, garnering sympathy and support. However, even heartwarming cases like Shay’s haven’t shielded the competition from criticism. Some argue that voters are manipulated into spending money on votes through emotional appeals such as Shay’s.
The Backlash Begins
The competition has faced fierce criticism from pet owners who accuse it of being an elaborate scam. Complaints about unfair rules and alleged emotional exploitation were also posted on social media platforms like Facebook and Reddit. Threads filled with accusations of deception illustrate the growing dissatisfaction among participants who say they were misled by the competition’s structure.
Opaque Rules Fuel Frustration
A key point of contention lies in America’s Favorite Pet’s voting system. Pets are divided into groups during the early rounds, meaning multiple pets can simultaneously claim first place within their respective groups. This structure creates confusion among participants who mistakenly think their pets are dominating the overall contest. Critics argue that this lack of transparency is not accidental and is done to encourage continuous spending on votes.
A Case Study: Misleading Expectations
Kelly Zelna, a Michigan resident who entered her tuxedo cat Richard into the contest, expressed these frustrations. Zelna was initially ecstatic that Richard had earned a first-place ranking in his group but soon discovered from other entrants that thousands of other pets had also earned a top spot in their respective groups. This made her feel cheated, and she was left questioning the legitimacy of the competition.
Aggressive Messaging Tactics
Participants also say they receive relentless updates urging them to buy votes for their pets. These messages often feature offers such as 2-for-1 vote deals, creating pressure to spend even more money to remain competitive. Some owners have even confessed to violating contest rules and buying votes for their own pets out of desperation.
The Impact of Social Media and Digital Influence
The competition depends heavily on social media campaigns for much of its success. Previous winners tend to have much larger online followings, giving them a boost over competitors who are not as digitally savvy. For example, Ysera, a cat who won in 2024, had over 778,000 followers on TikTok—a level of influence unattainable for most competitors.
Colossal Impact’s Defense
Colossal Impact — the company behind America’s Favorite Pet — defends its practices as transparent and fair. It emphasizes that all rules are clearly outlined on its website and claims that confusion stems from participants not reading or understanding them. The company also points to its charitable contributions as evidence of its positive impact.
Critics Weigh In
Experts such as Scaachi Koul contend that while Colossal may not be engaging in outright fraud, its gamified approach to fundraising exploits participants’ emotions and competitive instincts. Consequently, the focus on generating donations rather than objectively evaluating pets leaves many owners disillusioned when their expectations are not met.
The Contest Continues Amid Controversy
Despite widespread criticism, America’s Favorite Pet continues to be popular with many pet owners who hope to win its coveted prizes or boost charitable causes. As the 2025 edition concludes, Shay remains in contention for the top spot, a potential happy ending amidst ongoing debates about fairness and transparency.
A Divisive Legacy
America’s Favorite Pet serves as an example of the complexities of modern fundraising competitions — balancing charitable contributions with profit-driven motives while navigating public scrutiny. Whether reported as an uplifting initiative or a scheming ploy, the contest remains a hot topic among pet owners nationwide.
Explore more of our trending stories and hit Follow to keep them coming to your feed!
Don’t miss out on more stories like this! Hit the Follow button at the top of this article to stay updated with the latest news. Share your thoughts in the comments—we’d love to hear from you!
