For over fifty years, researchers have taught apes various forms of communication, from American Sign Language (ASL) to the use of lexigram boards. Projects like those involving Washoe the chimpanzee, Koko the gorilla, and Kanzi the bonobo aimed to bridge the communication gap between humans and our closest relatives. While these apes have demonstrated remarkable abilities to express their desires, emotions, and even rudimentary narratives, one perplexing aspect stands out: they have never initiated a question.
The Promise of Ape Linguistics
The journey began in the 1960s, when Allen and Beatrix Gardner adopted Washoe, a chimpanzee, and taught her ASL. Washoe could sign over 350 words, forming simple phrases like “water bird” for swan. Koko, a gorilla, became famous for her emotional depth and vocabulary of over 1,000 signs. Kanzi, a bonobo, demonstrated an understanding of spoken English and could communicate using lexigrams. These apes displayed intelligence that often seemed to blur the line between human and animal cognition.
Researchers eagerly anticipated that, given their linguistic training, the apes might eventually ask questions, revealing curiosity or a desire for understanding. Yet, despite decades of work, such moments never came.
The Absence of “Why”
In human children, the capacity to ask questions emerges as early as two years old, signaling a desire to learn and make sense of the world. Questions like “What is that?” or “Why?” are fundamental in human cognitive development. Among apes, however, this curiosity seems conspicuously absent. They request objects, actions, and even attention, but never inquire about the unknown.
This absence has puzzled scientists. Do apes lack curiosity, or is it a limitation of their cognitive abilities? Could their brains process questions, or does the very concept of asking belong exclusively to humans?
Cognitive Constraints or Cultural Differences?
One hypothesis suggests that apes lack the cognitive prerequisites for question-asking. Human brains have specialized neural circuits, particularly in the prefrontal cortex, that enable abstract thinking and syntactic structuring of questions. Apes, while intelligent, may lack the neural complexity required for such abstract operations.
Others propose that the difference lies in culture rather than biology. Humans raise their offspring in environments rich with question-asking behaviors. Children hear thousands of questions daily, which primes their brains to adopt this mode of communication. Apes in the wild, however, rely on non-verbal communication, with little evidence of question-like interactions.
Emotional Communication vs. Intellectual Inquiry
Apes excel at expressing emotions through their signs. Koko famously mourned her kitten, All Ball, after its death, signing “sad” repeatedly. Kanzi demonstrated humor by playfully using lexigrams to tease his caretakers. However, emotional expression differs fundamentally from intellectual inquiry.
Researchers have argued that apes may focus on immediate needs and emotions rather than abstract or hypothetical concepts. While they exhibit an understanding of their environment, their communication remains tethered to the tangible.
The Role of Reinforcement
Language learning in apes has relied heavily on positive reinforcement. Apes are rewarded for correct usage of signs or lexigrams, creating a system where communication is transactional. For example, Kanzi uses symbols to request bananas or playtime. Yet, this system might inadvertently limit their linguistic potential.
By focusing on rewards, researchers may have unintentionally reinforced only functional communication, sidelining creative or abstract use of language, including the formulation of questions.
The Question-Asking Paradox
Curiously, while apes have not asked humans questions, they seem to understand when humans ask them questions. Kanzi, for instance, could respond correctly when asked to identify objects or perform actions. This understanding suggests apes recognize the purpose of questions but do not see themselves as questioners.
Insights from Comparative Studies
Comparative studies with children raised in isolation or without rich linguistic environments have revealed parallels to apes. Such children often fail to develop question-asking skills, supporting the idea that exposure to a questioning culture is crucial. This finding implies that apes, placed in a more question-driven environment, might eventually mimic this behavior.
However, even apes exposed to decades of human questioning behavior, like Koko and Washoe, never crossed this threshold, suggesting a deeper cognitive or evolutionary barrier.
Implications for the Evolution of Language
The inability of apes to ask questions highlights the unique evolutionary trajectory of human language. Question-asking requires not only linguistic competence but also theory of mind—the ability to recognize that another entity possesses knowledge you lack. Humans demonstrate advanced theory of mind, while apes show only rudimentary levels, possibly explaining the gap.
The Question That Wasn’t Asked
One poignant anecdote comes from Penny Patterson, Koko’s caretaker. Patterson once signed to Koko about the concept of love, hoping to elicit a response. Koko signed back descriptions of her feelings but never asked, “What is love?” This moment encapsulated the central mystery: apes can express but not inquire.
Looking Beyond Language
Some researchers now question whether language is the best lens through which to study ape cognition. Apes may have cognitive strengths in areas humans overlook, such as spatial reasoning or social dynamics. Focusing on these strengths might provide a more balanced understanding of their intelligence.
Ethical Reflections on Ape Language Studies
Teaching apes human language has sparked debates about ethics. Critics question whether imposing human constructs on apes benefits them or merely entertains humans. Apes like Koko, who formed deep bonds with humans, faced unique challenges when those humans left or passed away.
Advocates argue that these studies improve our understanding of apes, fostering empathy and conservation efforts. However, they also stress the importance of respecting apes as they are rather than molding them into human likenesses.
A Shared Yet Divergent Journey
Decades of teaching apes sign language have deepened our appreciation of their intelligence and emotional depth, yet the absence of question-asking remains a stark boundary between species. While apes have demonstrated the ability to communicate, their silence on the unknown underscores the profound uniqueness of human curiosity.
This research serves as both a celebration of ape cognition and a reminder of the evolutionary path that led humans to ask, “Why?”—a path that, for now, remains uniquely ours.
Stay connected with us for more stories like this! Follow us to get the latest updates or hit the Follow button at the top of this article, and let us know what you think by leaving your feedback below. We’d love to hear from you!
