Sweeping job cuts at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are poised to upend the foundation of America’s environmental research just as the country faces mounting threats from pollution, climate change, and public health crises. Critics warn that these cuts threaten to dismantle decades of independent scientific expertise, undermining the EPA’s ability to safeguard clean air, water, and public health for millions of Americans at a time when evidence-based policy is more vital than ever.
Impact on Environmental Justice Initiatives
The EPA’s latest job cuts have dealt a severe blow to environmental justice initiatives, with employees facing termination and others being reassigned as the agency moves to close its Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights. These actions dismantle programs that have historically worked to protect low-income and minority communities disproportionately affected by pollution and environmental hazards.
Critics warn that eliminating these roles undermines efforts to address longstanding health disparities and environmental inequities, leaving vulnerable populations without critical federal support and resources. “This action is necessary to align our workforce with the Agency’s current and future needs and to ensure the efficient and effective operation of our programs,” said EPA Assistant Deputy Administrator Travis Voyles in a notice.
Scientific Research Under Threat
The Office of Research and Development (ORD) stands to lose the most during these job cuts. The ORD has long been the backbone of independent, impartial science on critical environmental issues such as air pollution, chemical safety, and public health risks. However, plans to reduce the EPA workforce to levels last seen in the 1980s include potentially cutting up to 1,155 scientific positions, 75% of ORD staff, and redistributing remaining scientists to policy and regulatory offices.
This fragmentation risks undermining decades of rigorous research that informs vital regulations, from identifying health hazards of PFAS chemicals to linking ozone exposure with respiratory illnesses. “This is a reorganization, not a reduction in force,” EPA spokeswoman Molly Vaseliou said.
The Scope of the Cuts
The number of jobs lost is staggering and includes slashing its budget by $300 million for fiscal year 2026. Internal documents reveal that up to 75% of the Office of Research and Development (ORD) staff-potentially over 1,100 scientific positions-are at risk of being eliminated, alongside the dissolution of this vital research office. Beyond research, the cuts extend across multiple divisions, including enforcement and environmental justice programs, threatening to dismantle critical functions that protect air and water quality and public health.
These reductions represent one of the largest federal workforce downsizing efforts in decades, raising serious concerns about the EPA’s capacity to fulfill its mission amid growing environmental challenges. “When finalized, EPA expects staffing levels near those seen when President Ronald Reagan occupied the White House,” Administrator Lee Zeldin said.
Loss of Expertise and Institutional Knowledge
With up to 75% of the Office of Research and Development’s scientific staff facing layoffs or reassignment, the agency risks fragmenting or entirely losing critical specialized skills in chemistry, biology, toxicology, and environmental health research. Veteran scientists warn that this “musical chairs” scenario, where fewer positions are available and many experienced researchers are displaced, will weaken the agency’s ability to conduct rigorous, independent science essential for informed policy-making.
“By gutting key institutions and driving away experts, this attack will endanger public health, clean air, and environmental progress while undermining independent scientific research in America,” Camden Weber, climate and energy policy specialist at the Center for Biological Diversity, said.
Public Health at Risk
Critical studies assessing health risks from persistent “forever chemicals” like PFAS, respiratory illnesses in vulnerable rural communities, and diseases worsened by climate change such as valley fever are already stalled or at risk of being abandoned. The agency’s ability to monitor and respond to environmental health hazards will now be severely compromised.
“The problem is that some areas of the country have much worse air pollution, and it cannot be treated as a one-size-fits-all,” said Kyla Bennett, director of science policy at the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.
Economic and Community Consequences
Reduced staffing and stalled research undermine the EPA’s ability to enforce regulations that protect clean air, water, and soil, leading to increased pollution that can harm local economies reliant on natural resources and tourism. Communities, especially those already burdened by environmental injustices, face heightened health risks that translate into higher medical costs and lost productivity.
The loss of federal grants and support for local environmental programs weakens community resilience and emergency response capabilities, leaving them more vulnerable to disasters like wildfires and chemical spills. These cuts threaten to destabilize countless Americans’ economic well-being and quality of life.
A Blow to Regulatory Science
This dismantling of the scientific infrastructure undermines the integrity and credibility of regulatory decisions, increasing uncertainty and vulnerability to environmental and public health threats. Experts warn that without a robust scientific foundation, the EPA’s capacity to protect air and water quality, regulate toxic chemicals, and respond to emerging environmental challenges will be severely compromised.
“Every person in this country, regardless of socioeconomic status, race, or Zip code, deserves clean water, air, and food,” Kyla Bennett, director of science policy at Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, said in an email. “These RIFs will ensure that overburdened communities will continue to suffer needlessly.”
Political Motives and Public Backlash
Spearheaded by the Trump administration and aligned with the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, these actions seek to reduce EPA staff, shift decision-making from career scientists to political appointees, and roll back environmental regulations deemed unfavorable to industry interests. This approach has sparked significant public backlash, including protests from EPA employees, environmental advocates, and community groups who warn that the cuts jeopardize public health and environmental protections.
“EPA is taking the next step to terminate the Biden-Harris Administration’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Environmental Justice arms of the agency,” the agency said in a statement. “This is the first step in a broader effort to ensure that EPA is best positioned to meet its core mission of protecting human health and the environment and Powering the Great American Comeback.”
Uncertain Future for Environmental Protection
While the EPA’s FY 2025 budget includes investments to tackle climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, aggressive efforts to reconsider or weaken key regulations-such as those addressing air pollution, hazardous chemicals, and greenhouse gases, threaten to undermine decades of progress.
Initiatives like Project 2025 aim to limit the agency’s scientific authority and enforcement capabilities, raising fears that the EPA will shift from preventing pollution to merely managing its aftermath. This uncertain trajectory jeopardizes the agency’s ability to protect public health, address environmental justice, and meet national and international climate commitments.
Explore more of our trending stories and hit Follow to keep them coming to your feed!
Don’t miss out on more stories like this! Hit the Follow button at the top of this article to stay updated with the latest news. Share your thoughts in the comments—we’d love to hear from you!
